Talk:Energy Czar
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editThere has been more than one "energy czar" for the United States. This redirect is therefore incorrect. W E Hill (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly. I made a stab at a starter article. Infrogmation (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Energy Czar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216030928/http://change.gov:80/newsroom/entry/the_energy_and_environment_team/ to http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/the_energy_and_environment_team/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721035950/http://www.energy.gov/about/timeline1971-1980.htm to http://www.energy.gov/about/timeline1971-1980.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Two jobs, two titles, one article - inappropriate?
editI think the unilateral move of this article from "Energy Czar" to "U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate" and adding material related to the latter office is inappropriate. The latter post does not seem to be a continuation of the earlier. I suggest putting the "Energy Czar" article back, and having a separate article for "U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate". Other thoughts? -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with Infrogmation. The Browner and Kerry positions are similar in spirit but different not just in name but also in specifics – the Kerry one looks to be more powerful as it will have a seat on the National Security Council. This article should go back to Energy Czar, with a redirect from Climate Czar. It should briefly discuss the White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy position that Browner held and link to it, like it used to before the move, and it can discuss state-level positions described as an energy or climate czar. Then it should discuss the new Kerry position and link to a new article U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Seeing no objections, I have done this. Wasted Time R (talk) 03:10, 26 November 2020 (UTC)