Talk:Engin Ardıç

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ardıç's Works

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Does anyone have a complete list of Ardıç's works? If so, please add them at the bottom of the current stub. I have most of their names, but not all of them. I'm planning to expand and make this stub a real article in the very near future. The article will need that complete list. Thanks in advance.Smyrniot 21:44, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also:

-- please include a link to his newspaper column.
-- mention the controversial positions he takes.
-- mention his willingness to inject coarse (=vulgar) language into his articles.
-- the peace award he won for a story on Greeks born in Turkish lands

Let's hope nobody falls in love with him, after reading the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.140.168.108 (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality dispute

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I placed a Template:POV tag in this article. Like the unsigned comment above this, I am very uncomfortable with the language of this article. There are too many praises about Engin Ardıç in this article rather than objective and verifiable assessments. Statements such as "his peers have been carried away by socialist currents but he succeeded in not getting carried away" are subjective judgements and personal interpretations. Who are the peers we are talking about? Have all of his peers been carried away or some of them? What are socialist currents? How do you label someone a socialist? All of these statements sound highly political critisms about Ardıç's nameless rivals in order to praise Ardıç himself. "He drew the ire of many secular Turkish intellectuals" is another subjective and judgemental statement. Who are these secular intellectuals? How do you measure their anger? It sounds to me like a couple of people who are known for their secular views disagreed with him in the past and the author of this sentence uses highly judgemental language to create a certain bias by labeling that disagreement as "getting extremely angry". This sort of language has no place in Wikipedia. Let's stick to the facts, shall we? How about a biography that lists this person's places of employment, education and one that perhaps explains his political views in an objective verifiable way?

---Vikiyazar (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic