Talk:Engine Yard

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Is there a specific reason that we don't have a logo for this company? Underdone (talk) 03:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


I don't know if Google and Microsoft should be classified as competitors...

This is an ad, not an article

edit

This article is filled with marketing and needs to be cleaned up by a neutral party or deleted entirely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.123.180 (talk) 21:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Best Companies to work for

edit

Would it be appropriate to mention Engine Yard's last place showing in Forbes List of Best Cloud Computing Companies and CEOs? Kevink707 (talk) 14:49, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Engine Yard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply