Talk:English overseas possessions in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 108.6.54.155 in topic Lack of Sources
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on English overseas possessions in the Wars of the Three Kingdoms. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Irish "Slaves"

edit

The Irish sent to Barbados and other Islands weren't slaves - they were mostly indentured servants, usually serving an indenture of 4 to 7 years. About about 25% were prisoners of war, or vagrants, etc, rounded up and transported involuntarily, and forced into indentured service usually for a 10-year period. They were often treated more harshly than those who voluntarily agreed to their indenture, especially on the island of Barbados, but they weren't slaves; they were treated better than the African slaves along side of whom they often worked, and after 10 years they gained their freedom. This argument - that they were "slaves" - is used by White Supremacists as a slur against African Americans, to argue that there is something wrong with African Americans insofar as they were unable to recover from slavery as well as their supposed white Irish counterparts; that type misinterpretation of history has no place here - to say nothing, of course, of its racist origin and nature. Kenwg (talk) 18:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Anne Hutchinson

edit

I am unaware of any reason to label Anne Hutchinson as a Baptist. When banished from Massachusetts, she removed to Rhode Island, initially settled by Baptist Roger Williams, but open to all religions. Had Hutchinson harbored Baptist positions, these would surely have been included in the confession she was required to read at her trial, but nothing of the sort appears there. Hutchinson's sister, Katherine Scott, became a Baptist and moved to Providence, but later became a Quaker; this may be the source of the confusion.Curmudgeonly Pedant (talk) 15:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Lack of Sources

edit

Much of the article is source less, leaving many details to be inexplicable. 108.6.54.155 (talk) 15:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply