Talk:Enhanced Messaging Service

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Enhanced Messaging Service article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Telecommunications Mid‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

compatibility problems of EMS

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm having difficulties finding citations about the compatibility problems of EMS, especially between carriers. I think this is related to the lack of information available about EMS overall. From my experience working in the inter-carrier messaging industry, EMS messages received on devices that do not support EMS will appear as unreadable, badly corrupted SMS messages due to the content of the message that is not 7-bit GSM. EMS messages are also unreliable when sent between carriers, as in many cases the inter-carrier network will not forward the message on, or the message will be dropped at the receiving carrier. I strongly encourage anyone with more information or who is able to locate citations to improve the article. Alereon (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

"In some countries, EMILY'S messages" - is this supposed to be EMS messages? 17:10, 23 January 2012 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.108.200.56 (talk)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Enhanced Messaging Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727102018/http://www.ctia.org/media/press/body.cfm/prid/1759 to http://www.ctia.org/media/press/body.cfm/prid/1759

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic