Talk:Enough Stupidity in Every Wise Man
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Andrew Swallow in topic Too clever by half
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Enough Stupidity in Every Wise Man article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article uses the following optional standards for Style elements.
Please help us maintain consistency in the article by following these standards:
Please do not change these settings unless consensus has been reached. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talk
editToo clever by half
editI was automatically redirected her from 'Too clever by half'. I can see the connection with the ideas behind the play but the two things are different. Something that is 'Too clever by half' is either so complicated that an honest man cannot get it to work or a trick by a possibly dishonest man. So stay away, because either way if you join in you will lose. Andrew Swallow (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)