Talk:Ensdorf-class minesweeper
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 74.10.226.170 in topic Seehund Too Large - Own Page
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ensdorf-class minesweeper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spelling
editSlight issue with spelling - the picture caption reads Seahunde while elsewhere it reads Seahund (no e). I would fix it myself, but not being a German speaker, I do not know which is correct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BevanFindlay (talk • contribs)
- Seehunde is plural, Seehund is singular - Alureiter 05:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
Seehund Too Large - Own Page
editIf the Seehund is too large to be carried by Endorf class vessels, then why make such a big deal about them on the Ensdorf's page? Seems more like "Endsdorf class vessels can also make use of the Troika Plus system to control Seehund ROVs" would suffice. The Seehund needs it's own page. 74.10.226.170 (talk) 13:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)