 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because while it has promotional tone issues, the level of rewrite required to salvage it is far less than "fundamental". --—chaos5023 (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
... and I have now done a significant amount of said rewriting. —chaos5023 (talk) 19:25, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Xinconnu (talk) 21:55, 29 March 2013 (UTC) It references a company in the cloud computing space that has been one of the top two players in cloud management and the article contains a number of references. Also, this article has been around for many years under the old company name. All I did was create a new article by copying the contents from the old page over to the new company name.
- Alas, that copy/paste is not what should have been done. It should have just been moved from the old name to the new one, and thus get the history to be carried along. The problem now is one of notability. It seemed to get a few mentions in 2009, then was bought out. If it really did put all "intellectual property" into open source, then there is probably not much left? Needs to have significant third-party coverage. W Nowicki (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)