Talk:Environmental humanities

Retracting Emergetics related AFD nominations, but this is a poor article

I had begun nominating this for WP:AFD, but a perceptive wikipedian caused me to reconsider so I retracted my overly hasty step. I still think this is a rather lousy article. As a general principle, I would submit that no good encyclopedia article can contain the statement "Everything is connected through relationships.". Ouch, that hurts. 24.159.243.211 06:47, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

I have omitted "Everything is connected through relationships". Please feel free to edit the entry if you think you can improve it, that is what we are here for. If there is original reseach it is in the "contemporary ideas", which seems to be the appropriate place. Sholto Maud 08:11, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

I've removed the "original research" tag. Sholto Maud has provided a good overview of The Ecological Humanities, IMO. He has provided extensive references, which check out. I find no evidence of original research. If you disagree, by all means, present some evidence. Sunray 07:08, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Ecomusicology as an ecological humanity?

Should ecomusicology be included in the ecological humanities?

Explicitly speaking, "ecomusicology" (as a word) comes from ecocriticism and musicology (rather than ecology and musicology). However, the Grove Dictionary definition of ecomusicology is that "Ecomusicology considers musical and sonic issues, both textual and performative, related to ecology and the natural environment." [1] so I feel it would be a relevant addition to this group, as it currently has a "literature" and "arts" categories but no "music".

Let me know what you think! ¬ laonikoss ^(talk) 17:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Makes sense to me. Have added it to Template:Environmental humanities. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 19:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

"Ecological" vs "Environmental" Humanities

Hi! I am new to Wikipedia and am wondering whether the editors of this page think it should be changed to "environmental humanities" rather than "ecological humanities"? The former term seems to be the more accepted one over at least the past five years. For example, major programs at universities around the world use this term, including UCLA in the USA <http://environmental.humanities.ucla.edu/page_id=52>, KTH in Sweden <http://www.kth.se/en/abe/inst/philhist/historia/ehl>, and Bath Spa University in the UK <http://www.bathspa.ac.uk/schools/humanities-and-cultural-industries/research-in-hci/research-centres-and-groups/environmental-humanities>, among others. Moreover, the major journal in the field is titled _Environmental Humanities_ <http://environmentalhumanities.org>. I am not aware of any major uses of "ecological humanities" in recent years, but I'd love to hear what others think about this issue. Lauren LaFauci (LiU) (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Totally agree with the points made above. A quick look at recent surveys of the field shows the term 'ecological humanities' as essentially defunct. This page is nearly at the top of a google search for 'environmental humanities' and it currently offers a confusing (and slightly misleading) angle.

For example, here are two recent (2016, 2017) introductions to the field:

Environmental Humanities: Voices from the Anthropocene edited by Serpil Oppermann and Serenella Iovino <https://www.rowmaninternational.com/book/environmental_humanities/3-156-7fe49a79-d0c9-4897-ad95-90ceb689013f>

The Environmental Humanities: A Critical Introduction by Robert S. Emmett and David E. Nye <https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/environmental-humanities>

薄暗いブルー (talk) 15:24, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ecological humanities. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060910043248/http://www.humanities.org.au/Policy/NRP/expandingRPpapers/GriffithsRP.pdf to http://www.humanities.org.au/Policy/NRP/expandingRPpapers/GriffithsRP.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Revisions in Progress to update the page

Hi all! I'm an assistant professor of Environmental Humanities in Sweden, working with a small team on a project that involves updating this and related environmental humanities pages. We are in the process of editing the page, but haven't finished yet. Thanks for your patience as it is unfinished at the moment! Any suggestions as we continue our work over the next couple of weeks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lauren LaFauci (LiU) (talk • contribs) 10:31, 25 September 2019 (UTC)