Talk:Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles

Fair use rationale for Image:NewLogo4webSm.gif

Image:NewLogo4webSm.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Personal Ordinariate

Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 08:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Why? Tb (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

The news about the personal ordinariates created a vast media sensation, and I felt it was justified to add appropriate links where the press had already asserted that there were logical consequences to the decision. So, it was like a 9/11 type of event, where the topic is so newsworthy that it deserves to be researched in detail with non-original sources. ADM (talk) 10:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Note to other editors: The first comment above by User:ADM is part of a broad spam on every Anglican-related page, and is not connected in some particular way to this article. Tb (talk) 10:10, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Expansion

First, some examples for improving and expanding this article: Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Miami was a featured article. The highest-class article on an Episcopal diocese is Episcopal Diocese of New York, which is ranked B-class (medium ranking; helpful to casual readers, but could still use plenty of work).

This article could easily use a history section and a section on its more significant/noteworthy ministries. The diocese has a lot of this information on their website, in particular their history page. That will be a good place to start for information, but some third-party sources will definitely be needed. The diocese's information on the schools in the Diocese, which could also warrant its own section in the article, can be found here. Again, third-party sources should be used to verify information. Ethraen (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012205719/http://www.cathedralsofcalifornia.com:80/ to http://www.cathedralsofcalifornia.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)