Talk:Episode 6 (Twin Peaks)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Episode 6 (Twin Peaks)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:56, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

• I feel that the intro should go Plot, Production, Ratings; rather than Production, Plot, Ratings

  How's it look now? GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• "in the small mountain town" Maybe add, Twin Peaks, just to be clear

  Added. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• "local businessman Benjamin Horne (Beymer) schemes to burn down its sawmill to further his property empire." -> "local businessman Benjamin Horne (Beymer) schemes to burn down his sawmill to further his property empire."

  Oh, it's not his. He just wants to buy the land cheap after he burns it. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• "…its broadcast; and has received positive reviews from critics." -> "its broadcast. The episode has received positive reviews from critics."

  Done. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• Maybe add (FBI) after Federal Bureau of Investigation, so that you can use the acronym later?

  Sure. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• "difficult to write for convincingly than others" -> "difficult to convincingly write for than others"

  Got it. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• A−, make that "A−" in quotes

  Got one. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

• If you want to make the page super-sexy, you can add publishers to some of the refs, but you don't have to

  Think I've got them all.

• Is "Bibliography" the right heading if you include a featurette?

  Hmm, that's why I generally go for "references"; guess that slipped in somewhere and has been copied since. Fixed now. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

That's all I can find. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, chief. Hope Monday goes grand for you. GRAPPLE X 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Excellent. Everything looks in order. As for Monday, I can now recite the entire meaning of Catullus 16, so I'm feeling better. And the best part is, its dirty. ;)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:41, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Episode 6 (Twin Peaks). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120829094505/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/twin-peaks/episode-six.php to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/twin-peaks/episode-six.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)