Talk:Epistemic innocence

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 10 June 2020 by reviewer Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs).

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Poorly described

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I’ve come here to read what epistemic innocence is, but it uses the word epistemic to describe itself. The whole page is written from someone who knows what epistemic means and so is approached in a way that assumes everyone understands this. Can you please rewrite to explain the term without using the word itself. The dictionary doesn’t use ‘parrot’ - a bird that looks like a parrot. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:F00A:BC00:6CB4:5011:3F47:2703 (talk) 01:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yup! I've just come across this from a link in IRC, and I cannot make heads nor tails of it! Badly written in "Jargon" so as to exclude outsiders from understanding it! Severely in need of clarification and a re-write! Joe JoePinball (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic