Talk:Epistles (Horace)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Latin Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page move

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This article needs a better title. The generic epistularum liber primus (“first book of letters”) could just as easily apply to the first book of Pliny or Cicero of any other Latin writer whose letters have survived in more than one book. I would suggest that we move the page to Epistulae (Horace) on the model of Epistulae (Pliny) (see also Epistulae (disambiguation)). The red link Epistularum liber secundus listed among the works at Horace does not, in my view, need to be created, even as a redirect. Comments? Camenae (talk) 20:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I notice that Dbachmann has moved this page to Letters (Horace) [1]. These works are rarely if ever called "Letters". The Oxford Classical Dictionary, the standard English language reference on the Classical world, calls the "Epistles", as does the Loeb Classical Library, Encyclopædia Britannica, and even World Book. I am moving the page to Epistles (Horace), though my personal preference would be for Epistulae (Horace). Camenae (talk) 12:35, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epistles (Horace). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221002930/http://www.uah.edu/student_life/organizations/SAL/texts/latin/classical/horace/epistulae101.html to http://www.uah.edu/student_life/organizations/SAL/texts/latin/classical/horace/epistulae101.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic