Talk:Epsilon Boötis

Boötes, not Gemini

Since this star is called Epsilon Boötes, I'm assuming it's in the Boötes constellation, and not in the Gemini constellation as claimed on the right, no? --Mithcoriel 16:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Minimum aperture

76mm minimum aperture for splitting Izar is excessive. In theory, even 50mm should be enough. People report splitting it with good 60mm refractors http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Board/genobs/Number/5201089/page/0/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/o/fpart/all Florin Andrei (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

You're undoubtedly right, but we have to base our content on reliable sources per WP:Citing sources. The source says it can be split with 76mm or greater, which would be true regardless. Regards, RJH (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Epsilon Boötis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110129031951/http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_h_l.htm to http://www.lcsd.gov.hk/CE/Museum/Space/Research/StarName/c_research_chinengstars_h_l.htm
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6630AbtJZ?url=http%3A%2F%2Foutreach.atnf.csiro.au%2Feducation%2Fsenior%2Fastrophysics%2Fphotometry_colour.html to http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Epsilon Boötis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926185552/http://www.purplehell.com/riddletools/stars.htm to http://www.purplehell.com/riddletools/stars.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)