 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
A topic of.....
editEquestrian sport has been added based on the following http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&q=allintitle%3A+Aspergillus+fumigatus+horses&btnG=Search --222.64.223.101 (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=airborne+bacteria+horse&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=all&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1 --222.64.223.101 (talk) 04:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Lead Section
Provides definition but could go into more detail about what all is considered to be "equestrian" such as the various disciplines Too short; not enough information
Content
Gives bullet points of examples More detail would be beneficial Good variety but no real weight to the information Little to no information about this topic
Tone and Balance
No tone as the wiki page is too short and too little information
Sources and References
No sources section, but links provides throughout the page. Essentially seems to be a page to link you to other pages with actual information If this wiki page should stay on Wiki, I believe it should be able to stand alone and have actual content, rather than only string into other Wiki pages
Organization and Writing Quality
Very straight forward and organized as expected Good use of bullet points, but sub-categories could also be useful No outline Only 3 categories
Images and Media
No images or media directly on this page Could be beneficial to help one understand the idea
Talk Page Discussion
Only links have been added No actual talking points Is within the WikiProject Disambiguation
Overall Impressions
Needs a LOT of work if it is to stand alone as a wiki page When researching on Wiki, it seems that other equestrian pages are more beneficial and provide much more detail-if so, why have another page talking about the same thing? Overall, article needs work if it is to remain as a stand-alone Last edited in 2010 Article is not near completion; poorly developed and needs to be redone for better education of the sport