Talk:Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Johnbod in topic Nonexistent pedestal

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Artstudent33.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why did it survive?

edit

The text has (or had) an answer to this question "The statue of Marcus Aurelius was perhaps not melted down because in the Middle Ages it was incorrectly thought to portray the first Christian Emperor, Constantine.[1]"

An anon doesn't like this answer, calling into question the source's reliability. It looks quite reasonable to me, so I've revert him or her. It looks to me like this is just a difference of opinion between a reliable source and an anon. Feedback?

  1. ^ John Baskett (2006). The Horse in Art. Yale University Press. pp. 17–. ISBN 0-300-11740-X.

Smallbones(smalltalk) 12:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I haven't read the source used, but vaguely remember reading this somewhere (else). Not sure why he has taken against it so strongly. Johnbod (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Right, top of a google search, from the Khan video already linked: "A text known as the Liber Pontificalis that dates to the middle of the tenth century C.E. mentions the equestrian monument, referring to it as “caballus Constantini” or the “horse of Constantine.” According to the text, the urban prefect of Rome was condemned following an uprising against Pope John XII and, as punishment, was hung by the hair from the equestrian monument. At this time the equestrian statue was located in the Lateran quarter of the city of Rome near the Lateran Palace, where it may have been since at least the eighth century C.E. Popular theories at the time held that the bearded emperor was in fact Constantine I, thus sparing the statue from being melted down." There are tons of others (and more). Johnbod (talk) 14:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
And why did this suddenly get 8,000 views yesterday? Johnbod (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Equestrian Statue of Marcus Aurelius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nonexistent pedestal

edit

"sitting on a pedestal that was later provided by Pope Sixtus IV."

How could it sit on a pedestal that didn't yet exist? 2A02:AA1:1640:F051:E553:3DCD:AB74:9760 (talk) 09:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fixed Johnbod (talk) 12:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply