Talk:Equestrian statue of George B. McClellan/Archive 1

Comment

please do not redirect an article about a statue, not the subject of the statue. if you wish take it to Afd, be my guest. Slowking4 (talk) 2:37 pm, 9 February 2011, Wednesday (3 years, 11 months, 16 days ago) (UTC−5)

Okay, maybe then put a redirect at the top for if you want the person and then one on that page for if you want to see the statue.Kamkek (talk) 2:40 pm, 9 February 2011, Wednesday (3 years, 11 months, 16 days ago) (UTC−5)

doneSlowking4 (talk) 2:43 pm, 9 February 2011, Wednesday (3 years, 11 months, 16 days ago) (UTC−5)

Possible sources

APK whisper in my ear 12:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

"National Register of Historic Places Inventory--Nomination Form - Civil War Monuments in Washington, D.C", by Gary Scott, National Park Service, September 19, 1977 "Major General George B. McClellan, (sculpture)", Smithsonian American Art Museum "District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites", District of Columbia Office of Planning - Historic Preservation Office, September 30, 2009 "A M'clellan Statue", Evening Star, April 5, 1901 "Models to be Shown", Evening Star, March 5, 1902 "Graceful Models for the McClellan Statue", The Washington Times, June 1, 1902 "Were All Rejected", Evening Star, June 17, 1903 "M'Monnies Selected", Evening Star, August 12, 1903 "Citizens Suggest Site", Evening Star, June 1, 1906 "Statue of McClellan", Evening Star, June 17, 1906 "Site of McClellan Statue", Evening Star, June 18, 1906 "An Army of Veterans", Evening Star, May 1, 1907 "McClellan Statue Unveiling Today", The Washington Herald, May 2, 1907 "Bronze Statue of 'Little Mac'", Evening Star, May 3, 1907 "Veterans Dedication McClellan Statue", The Washington Herald, May 3, 1907 "Maj. Gen. George B. McClellan", The National Tribune, May 9, 1907 "Neglected D.C. Statues Restored in Effort to Conserve Public Art", by Michael E. Ruane, The Washington Post, August 11, 2009 "Preserving and restoring our nation’s monuments", by Partnership for Public Servics, The Washington Post, April 15, 2014 "Testament to Union: Civil War Monuments in Washington, D.C.", by Kathryn Allamong Jacob, pgs, 130-134, JHU Press, Baltimore, 1998, ISBN 9780801858611 "George B. McClellan and Civil War History: In the Shadow of Grant and Sherman", by Thomas J. Rowland, Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio, 1998, ISBN 9780873386036 "Kalorama Triangle: The History of a Capital Neighborhood", by Stephen A. Hansen, pgs. 125-127, The History Press, Charleston, 2011, ISBN 9781609494216

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Major General George B. McClellan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Caponer (talk · contribs) 19:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

AgnosticPreachersKid, I will be completing a thorough and comprehensive review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. Thanks! -- Caponer (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you! APK whisper in my ear 19:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

AgnosticPreachersKid, this article is quite comprehensive and is well-written like your other wonderful articles illustrating the design land history of D.C.'s monuments. Following my review and re-review, I assess that this article meets the majority of criteria for Good Article status. I do have a few comments, questions, and suggestions that should be addressed before final passage to Good Article status. Thank you for all your incredible work on this article! -- Caponer (talk) 19:54, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lede

• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines the topic, establishes the necessary context, and explains why the statue is notable.
• The template's image has been released into the public domain and is therefore free for use in this article.
• I suggest mentioning that the statue of Nathan Hale is in New York City.
• The lede is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.

 Done APK whisper in my ear 20:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

History
Background

• I suggest adding a wiki-link for the first mention of the Civil War in the first paragraph of this subsection.
• The Frederick William MacMonnies self portrait has been released into the public domain and is therefore free to use here.
• An apostrophe should be added to MacMonnies' name in the sentence beginning "MacMonnies other well-known Civil War..."
• The sentence beginning "After his initial design was rejected due to costs overrun and design critiques..." should probably be re-worded to "After his initial design was rejected due to increased costs..." or "After his initial design was rejected due to an overrun of costs..." or something to that effect. Oh, or "After his initial design was rejected due to costs overruns..." So that both the costs and overruns are plural.
• Kalorama Triangle should be wiki-linked in its first mention within the article's prose. Connecticut Avenue and Columbia Road should also be wiki-linked in their first mention in the prose within this subsection.
• Do any of the sources mention whether this site is imposing due to the fact it's at the top of a hill, looking downhill into Downtown? This isn't necessary, but it would explain why the location was more imposing than the others mentioned during the site selection process.
• This subsection is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.
  • I'll find a ref. APK whisper in my ear 20:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
    • AgnosticPreachersKid, I wouldn't conduct the most exhaustive search for an additional reference for this, so if one is not available, it is not a deal breaker. I just thought it would be nice to capture just how indeed imposing this site is for the statue. -- Caponer (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
      • Well, I looked, but only see that the commission called it a "more satisfactory and imposing" location. No reason as to why they considered it imposing. APK whisper in my ear 21:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Dedication

• The Evening Star photo of the dedication has been released into the public domain and is therefore free for use here.
• Should it be restated that Brigadier General Henry C. Dwight was president of the Society of the Army of the Potomac?
• This subsection is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.

 Done APK whisper in my ear 20:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Later history

• The image is a creation of the article's author and is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0, therefore it is free for use here.
• The abbreviation NRHP isn't necessary as this is its only mention within the article's prose.
• This subsection is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.
  • The NRHP abbreviation is used in the second sentence of the first paragraph. APK whisper in my ear 20:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
    • You are absolutely right AgnosticPreachersKid. That was my mistake for overlooking it and I apologize. Thank you for catching this! -- Caponer (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
      • No worries. :-) APK whisper in my ear 21:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Design and location

• Columbia Road and Connecticut Avenue should be de-linked here as they are mentioned earlier within the article's prose. However, Downtown (Washington, D.C.) could be wiki-linked here as it hadn't been mentioned earlier in the prose.
• This subsection is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.

 Done APK whisper in my ear 20:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

• • AgnosticPreachersKid, upon re-reviewing the article and your responses to my comments, I assess that the article meets all Good Article criteria and I hereby pass it! Thank you for all your extraordinary work on this article! -- Caponer (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! APK whisper in my ear 21:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.