Talk:Erdős–Faber–Lovász conjecture

Very deep

The term "very deep" is used in the first paragraph of the current version. I don't know if this is a technical term, and if it is, what does it mean? If it is not, there must be a better term than "very deep." Please clarify. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 01:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

It's been there since the start of this article, but I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean either. It doesn't seem to fit the definition in Mathematical jargon#deep: it's not a result, it's a problem, so we don't know what sort of techniques would be needed to solve it. I think it's just editorialization, and should probably just be removed. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:35, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Great. If someone thinks it needs to be in there, they can better clarify when they add it back. Oswald Glinkmeyer (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Erdős–Faber–Lovász conjecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706202317/http://lists.rmc.ca/academic/math_cs/tardif/paper25/paper25.pdf to http://lists.rmc.ca/academic/math_cs/tardif/paper25/paper25.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)