Talk:Eric Weddle

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bagumba in topic Copyright problem removed

File:Weddle.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Weddle.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Half-time Controversy

edit

I disagree, this should be in lead. It is the defining moment of his careeer.Mwinog2777 (talk) 14:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

That is absolutely not true.--Yankees10 18:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eric Weddle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eric Weddle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Eric Weddle

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Eric Weddle's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "spotrac":

  • From Reggie Nelson: "Spotrac.com: Reggie Nelson contract". Spotrac.com. Retrieved May 9, 2018.
  • From Kyle Arrington: "Spotrac.com: Kyle Arrington contract". Spotrac.com. Retrieved April 27, 2018.
  • From Casey Hayward: "Spotrac.com: Casey Hayward contract". Spotrac.com. Retrieved February 12, 2018.
  • From Nick Boyle: "Spotrac.com: Nick Boyle contract". spotrac.com. Retrieved December 4, 2017.
  • From Darius Slay: "Spotrac.com: Darius Slay contract". spotrac.com. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  • From Patrick Onwuasor: "Spotrac.com: Patrick Onwuasor contract". Spotrac.com. Retrieved May 8, 2018.
  • From Tony Jefferson: "Spotrac.com: Tony Jefferson contract". Spotrac.com. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
  • From Jahleel Addae: "Spotrac.com: Jahleel Addae". spotrac.com. Retrieved January 15, 2018.
  • From Devin McCourty: "Spotrac.com: Devin McCourty contract". Spotrac.com. Retrieved April 26, 2018.
  • From Paul Posluszny: "Spotrac.com: Paul Posluszny contract". spotrac.com. Retrieved March 6, 2018.
  • From Glover Quin: "Spotrac.com: Glover Quin contract". Spotrac.com. Retrieved April 27, 2018.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 04:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20141211054324/http://www.chargers.com/team/roster/eric-weddle/f387ca47-e2bc-4716-9701-45026c431914/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply