Talk:Ernest Becker

Untitled

The information is used with permission.

---

I'd like to raise a flag for that last paragraph. I don't think first person should be used in articles and this sentence "no one reads Becker without their world view changing." is, I think, pushing NPOV. Mimsie 20:52, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Rewrite?

I think this article could use a thorough re-write. While I have no problem with utilizing information from the Ernest Becker Foundation website, I do think it needs to be included in the context of a proper biographical article. A few essential and basic facts about Becker are left out (Where was he educated? Where did he work?) and the PR-feel of the foundation's text leaves out any discussion, critical or otherwise, of his theories. Inoculatedcities 13:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

E. Becker

I am currently studying @ U of alberta (soc. 440w M. Gillespie)the limited background info. is good thx. for including the ISBN no,s. wikipedia roks hard beauty JADA444 internet newby. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.151.55.32 (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC).

File:Ernest Becker.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ernest Becker.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Becker lecture 1960.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Becker lecture 1960.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2011 (UTC)