Talk:Ernst Troeltsch
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Is this article still a stub?
editIs this article still a stub? I think it may be long enough to be brought up to start class now. Vorbee (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agreed. Endymion.12 (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- I think you've skipped past Start (which usually reflects articles that are unstructured or entirely missing obvious, important sections) to C. I've updated the assessment accordingly. --RL0919 (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Minor cleanup.
edit ... I guess I'm trying to decide if this topic is a thing, in some sense. I dunno if it matters, and I've more or less made tiny adjustments, as if I'd decided it must, whether I get it or not. Just sayin' ... guess it seems a shame to write so precisely while pretending not to know why commas were invented.
--Jerzy•t 23:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Re: human nature and modernity
editHe presented human nature as being fairly constant throughout time.
More needs to be said. Viriditas (talk) 23:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
[he believed] Protestantism delayed, rather than heralded, modernity.
Isn't that pretty much the opposite of what historians of science believe today? Viriditas (talk) 23:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)