Talk:Esenwein & Johnson
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Jschnur in topic Contested deletion
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... the firm is notable because it has designed multiple significant works including some listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Article just barely started; it is a work in progress. Sources, offline and online, yet to be added. NRHP nomination documents are among the sources, whose contents are not usually found via Google, so it may not be obvious from google search alone, but this is a notable firm. --doncram 04:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- Nominator comment: In view of doncram's comment above I now oppose speedy deletion. Good luck with the article. Jschnur (talk) 04:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- PS I've removed the speedy deletion template. Jschnur (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)