Talk:Espanto Jr. (CMLL)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Note This review is part of a series of reviews by an editor on articles of a similar topic. Because of this, the various reviews may reference each other. Please also see Los Espantos, Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Espanto Jr., Espanto Jr. (CMLL), and Los Hijos del Espanto if things are unclear. Disclosure: Both the nom and reviewer are participating in the WikiCup, if need be, anyone may request a second opinion if they feel my review is not following the GA criteria. Thanks. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Fourth and final round. Ding ding.

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.

1. "...traditionally not something Mexican news sources would report on" this needs a citation.

   Fixed, the previous citation does elaborate on the secretive nature and covers that claim,

2. I merged two sentences, neither of which had a citation, into "has at least nine uncles that are or were involved with professional wrestling over the years." which needs a citation. Feel free to revert if it wasn't an improvement, but the previous sentences also needed a citation as well

   I had the citation later on when it listed 8 Andrades by name and 2 more that were not identified (father + 9 uncles), so I moved it up to cover this statement as well. In the book, it was covering the family of La Sombra since it was printed before Espanto Jr. made his debut, but the number of uncles remains the same since they are both 3rd generation Andrades.

3. It is not clear if the external image is in line with WP:EL. Is it posted and maintained by the copyright holder or is it an image reposted by someone who does not hold teh copyright? I ask because it's hosted on blogspot which doesn't really check for those things, and if it is not in line with copyright, it cannot be linked to.

   I am not sure about the status so to be safe I took it off.

• @Wugapodes: - I hope that covered the concerns?  MPJ-DK  14:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Results

On hold Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 14:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

• @Wugapodes: - Dang I somehow took this off my watch list and missed your comments. I will work on this ASAP.  MPJ-DK  14:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Promoted I'm glad I reviewed this series; very interesting topic and a wonderful addition to our coverage. Keep up the good work! Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 15:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)