Talk:Esra Bilgiç

Hülya Darcan

Hammad, hello. Why remove the Template:Interlanguage link Hülya Darcan [1]? It helps interested readers find more info, and editors who want to make an article has a startingpoint to look for sources. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Esbilgic NextTV-12.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Negative reaction BRRD

Hipal and other interested.

You removed "During the run of Diriliş: Ertuğrul, Bilgiç received negative criticism by some Pakistani (mostly male) fans on social media for her behaviour outside the series as morally lacking regarding her Instagram posts featuring her with western clothes. In response she disabled comments in several posts." twice, second time with the comment "please discuss on talk page - if it's not trivia, it looks like a rather gross POV vio given the context in the sources vs what's here".

Here's some available sources. They seem reasonably WP:RS for the topic, not glaringly tabloid, not local (as in Turkey), and apart from Al Jazeera, they are in-depth.

[2][3]Dawn (newspaper), [4]The Express Tribune, [5]India Today and [6]Al Jazeera.

I don't think you'll find equal WP:RS sourcing about her wedding, but I haven't actually checked. What do you feel is a reasonable summary of these sources? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for starting a discussion.

I don't currently have time to go into this in depth, but it seems to me that the removed content doesn't include the actual (encyclopedic) context. It uses vague terms with Wikipedia's voice, "negative criticism", "behaviour", "morally lacking". Without going into the references and potential refs in depth, I'd suggest reversing the content completely: Emphasize her action, disabling comments, with a brief explanation of what she was reacting to and its context.

It appears the refs have cultural assumptions that are unclear to a wider audience. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 19:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

"...refs have cultural assumptions..." that's an argument I haven't come across before. Sounds somewhat WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Isn't it the people they are writing about that have the cultural assumptions? Of course, don't we all. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure you understand. I hope it's ok to assume we agree that a reference can be written from a cultural perspective (or other in-world perspectives for that matter). If not then more discussion is needed. We don't act as a soapbox. We provide encyclopedic context.

I'm guessing that there are unstated assumptions that need to be made clear in order for us to find encyclopedic context on the subject matter, if it's also WP:DUE.

You didn't comment on the use of Wikipedia's voice, or that the terms are vague. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 19:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

No, I don't see a problem with the above in WP:s voice, that's why I reverted you. It's supported by the the sources, and what you call vague I think is a reasonable summary of the sources I read, though it can of course be improved, suggestions for changes appreciated. The indepth coverage makes it WP:DUE to include this hullaballoo in the article. As for unstated assumptions/encyclopedic context, does the two paragraphs on the topic here [7] (Philippine Daily Inquirer) make it clearer? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes, that provides the context that was lacking - cultural context as I'd guessed. Thanks.

Here's the refs you mention above, spread out for comment: --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

[8]

[9]Dawn (newspaper)

[10]The Express Tribune

[11]India Today

[12]Al Jazeera.

I assume you intend to follow these with comments or deconstruction or something? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I haven't gotten back to this sooner.

Yes, I mean to comment on the refs, but you could do so as well. I've skimmed through them, and there's plenty of context we could use, must use instead of what was there.

"Actress disables social media commenting..." is NOTNEWS. "Muslim actress struggles to meet cultural expectations of her fans" is a lot closer to what I expect we'll end up with. Yes, it's just another "Actress isn't enough like the character she plays" situation, but I think we can work something out. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 19:47, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

What, you're saying this is not unique? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia Vandalism Forced Google To Lists Esra Bilgic As Yasir Hussain’s Mother

Yes, yes, very funny. And no, this does not go into the article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

I wouldn't give much creedence to Cloutnews, it's a blackhat SEO spam site. It's garbage. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 09:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough, but there was some IP editing that made this plausible. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Esra Bilgiç 2020.webp

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Images

2 other leadimages have been recently added, neither is likely to be "own work". Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:54, 9 May 2021 (UTC)