Talk:Estadio Monumental "U"

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peru Low‑importance

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Estadio Monumental "U" received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Any contributions or correction of facts are greatly welcomed :) -Dynamax

Hosted Games

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There was an error in the article. It stated that the Estadio Monumental "U" hosted the FIFA U-17 Finals between Mexico and Brazil. This is not true because the Estadio Nacional hosted this game. MicroX 20:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

First or second largest?

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the article we can read:

"It is Peru’s largest stadium and also the second largest in South America, behind Brazil's Maracanã. It has a spectator-capacity of 80,093"

Maracanã's capacity is 78838, according to the article in english wiki.

So, do we need to modify Maracanã's article, or Monumental's article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.234.108.132 (talk) 22:25, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've made the change. --MicroX (talk) 03:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Estadio Monumental "U". Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090504073948/http://www.fpf.com.pe/escenario.htm to http://www.fpf.com.pe/escenario.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic