Talk:Eternal Atake

change the "is" to "was" in regard to uzi's birthday

his birthday was in the past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.179.64 (talk) 23:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2020

The track listing shouldn't be separated into three parts because it is unofficial or just a creative idea. The track listing is not officially separated anywhere. Combine the track listings into a whole (track 1 to track 18). Thanks. Kertudbre (talk) 09:09, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

While it isn't official in terms of being on streaming or download services, Lil Uzi Vert confirmed a fan's idea that it was divided into tracks based on which persona he "inhabits" during that part of the album here. Ss112 09:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2020

If you look at Uzi's social media he has published the track listing of this album's deluxe edition. Please update it according to https://twitter.com/LILUZIVERT/status/1238271604578234373/photo/1 Kertudbre (talk) 09:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

It's a separate article, and you know this. Ss112 09:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ss112, look https://music.apple.com/us/album/eternal-atake-deluxe-luv-vs-the-world-2/1502707380 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kertudbre (talk • contribs) 12:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 March 2020

Someone created Lil Uzi Vert vs. the World 2 earlier and I have redirected to this album because that is an unofficial name of the deluxe edition of this album. It is releasing today. Please remove every instance of Lil Uzi Vert vs. the World 2 from this page and other Lil Uzi Vert pages. Thank you! Kertudbre (talk) 09:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@Kertudbre: Your redirect has been undone as the title is not "unofficial". Lil Uzi Vert confirmed it himself here. It has separate cover art, and its own track list (the latter as shown here). If it were simply a deluxe edition, the tracks would be added onto Eternal Atake and be numbered accordingly. So no, it will not be removed from other Lil Uzi Vert articles nor here for this reason. Your assertion in an edit summary that "no fool" would release two albums in two weeks is contradicted by Future having done so in 2017, and artists throughout history releasing two separate albums, even "parts" of a series, on the one day, like Guns N' Roses in 1991. I suggest you stop edit warring to retain the redirect of Lil Uzi Vert vs. the World 2 or you will most likely be warned/blocked and/or the page protected. Thanks. Ss112 09:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ss112: Somebody already add the tracklist in the article [1]. Should this be removed? TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Had not noticed that. Yes, it should be removed as it's not confirmed if it will be added onto the album in this way. From Lil Uzi Vert's own image of the track list, it's numbered 1 to 14 as a separate release. Ss112 09:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ss112: Done [2]. And one more thing about the article, it have a lot of issues regarding the sources, I have replaced the unreliable sources such as Twitter and add better sources in it [3]. But I don't think the content marches the sources since the content was taken mostly from Twitter. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:19, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts: Well, artists' verified social media accounts as sources are fine in moderation, as long as they are talking about themselves/their work and it's not a controversial claim (per WP:TWITTER). Although yes, news sources are preferred and should replace them where possible, I don't really see in this instance that you removed a substantial amount of content sourced to social media accounts, so it should be fine. As long as those sources do contain the information that was at the social media posts. Ss112 10:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ss112: I take your word. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Merge with Lil Uzi Vert vs. the World 2

@Ss112: @Nice4What: After I looking at this source, should we just merge the article Lil Uzi Vert vs. the World 2 with Eternal Atake, in Apple Music it called Eternal Atake (Deluxe). I see no reason that should be in a article by itself. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

I think since the deluxe edition has so many songs separate from Eternal Atake, it merits its own article. Lets see if publications review the deluxe reissue separately from EA. Kind of like how Beyoncé has a separate article for its Platinum Edition and also the companion EP? We should need to make the distinction between EA and LUVvTW2 clear in both articles. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 13:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@Nice4What: Thanks for pointed that out. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

@TheAmazingPeanuts these guys are going so far to call it a reissue studio album just so they don't lose this argument with me (I had been removing the LUVVTW2 page by putting it to here but they keep reinstating it) and get to keep their stupid page. It's obviously the deluxe version of this album so it goes in this album's page! Why put in a separate page where people have to unnecessarily go to another page just to see the real deal. People amaze me these days. Can't believe it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kertudbre (talk • contribs)

Because if the reissue is notable enough, it can have a separate article. See the examples above (and Reclassified for another.) The reception/background for Eternal Atake will be completely different from LUVvTW2. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 14:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

The Fame and The Fame Monster are also a similar situation. Nikki Lee 1999 (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

What evidence do you have to call it a "reissue"? Not a single source in the world describes it as a standalone album. Everything refers to it as the deluxe version of EA. You fanboys are making up your own story and giving it a new name. Just because this deluxe is given its own name you're adding your own spin to how it actually is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kertudbre (talk • contribs) 10:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Taylor Swift albums are 10 times the size of this article but include deluxe editions. So stop acting like Eternal Atake deluxe is some kind of Beatles album that just won 10 Grammies and deserves its own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kertudbre (talk • contribs) 11:06, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

@Kertudbre: Editor JJMC89 have moved the page back as before, don't move pages without permission or discussion at the talk page first and don't make edits based on your opinion, like you did here. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 22:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Oppose Let's see what other people say, and how evidence shifts in the next few weeks or so. But it definitely doesn't seem to me as if the.... whatever it is, which Lil Uzi Vert released on March 13th should be considered the same album. This seems more like a second album that Uzi is bundling with Eternal Atake for marketing reasons. This seems comparable to Future and Hendrxx more than anything. Nikki Lee 1999 (talk) 21:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose per above, though this isn't a formal move request anyways. Pitchfork has reviewed EA and LUVvTW2 as separate projects, proving that they're distinguishable from each other. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 17:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose per reasoning given by Nice4What. - DovahDuck (talk 18:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation article request.

When I google "Celebration Station", I get exactly what I was looking for: The theme park/restaurant chain that's been around for decades.

When I want more information and history about Celebration Station I would reasonably try to search for it on Wikipedia. Which points to a totally unrelated article about a garbage rap song made in the last year.

In fact, why is "Celebration Station" forcing a redirect to this article at all? I would argue the restaurant chain is more notable and should have priority for the article than the song.

A disambiguation article would help alleviate sending people an article they weren't interested in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8081:1610:e059:adb3:f4da:905e:2c52 (talk) 07:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)