This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Wrong high school graduation
editHello, His schools are mixed up. He graduated from GDS not JDS. He went to JDS for middle school and possibly 9th grade. Source: I was at GDS with him. I see the fact about his graduation is currently unsourced anyway. 45.118.76.252 (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Removal of Source #26
editSource 26 I will work on trying to delete. That instagram post has since been deleted. I will work on adding more reliable sources and a more neutral professional tone as well. PurpleProses (talk) 16:48, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Ariana Grande
editI don't see how the inclusion of this reported relationship does not fail WP:GOSSIP. Yes, People is regarded as a reliable source; however, nonetheless, the reported content is literally gossip and not confirmed by either party. We aren't a news website. Additionally, the source cited has no merit to stand on in regards to verification as it uses reported sources as a means of source. There is absolutely no confirmation of the relationship and stands on gossip sources. Therefore, the cited source is unreliable. – Callmemirela 🍁 21:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- People certainly like reading Wikipedia personal life sections though. I'm apathetic regarding the inclusion of the reported Ariana Grande relationship, though I think the fact that he's filing for divorce from his wife should be kept, as such I've added it back, but removed the Grande stuff pending a consensus in this discussion. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
- I can attest to the the first sentence myself. However, policy and consensus trump over readers' wants. I have no issue with the divorce fillings just so as long it's referenced appropriately. It's the mention of Grande that goes against policy for the time being should either of them actually confirm such relationship. – Callmemirela 🍁 22:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)