Talk:Ethan Winters/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 11:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

At the request of BloatedBun, I will happily review this article using the table below. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 11:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	In the quotebox it should say GamesRadar+ as that is the websites name In Resident Evil 7: Biohazard, players takes Ethan's – takes needs to be singular the local merchant, The Duke, that she can – commas are not needed around The Duke kidnap Rosemary and he was trying to protect – comma before and such as Chris Moyse from Destructoid or Liana Ruppert from Game Informer – or should be changed to and Josh West from GamesRadar suggested – should say GameRadar+ Resident Evil 7 is unprecedented, and noted that Capcom had never – no comma before and Resident Evil protagonist, and felt an unskilled everyman – comma before and is not needed overwhelming odds subverts player expectations of – overwhelming odds, subverting player's expectations of a game (Resident Evil 7) that upsets – change the parentheses to brackets A lot in the reception starts with John Cena from WWE.com. Change it up a little bit so its not monotonous and say things like WWE.com's John Cena or John Cena, writer at WWE.com. For other examples you can look at other fictional characters' reception section could not recall his name, and felt that the player was – comma before and is not needed along with Jill Valentine and Lady Dimitrescu – comma after Dimitrescu
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Change GamesRadar to GamesRadar+ in the refs I don't think the postscript for Behind the Voice Actors is needed as it is a reliable source and was put on the list of sources at WP:RSP after I did an RFC about its reliability a little bit ago.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Woah... this is my first article that I didn't find an unreliable source in
	2c. it contains no original research.	Spotchecks for refs 1, 5, 12, 18, 20, 26, and 29 are good
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	The copyvio detector picked a 42.9% violation from one website and 31% from another. The second one id definitly copying from Wikipedia. I can tell because of the date. The first one I cannot tell, but usually websites do not write in the way Wikipedia does for a plot.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Don't see any words to warch, puffery, or any other WP:NPOV problems I found
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	There is only one fair use image, and it has a good rational
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Thanks for the review Kaleeb18. I believe I've already addressed all your concerns. BloatedBun (talk) 11:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Congrats on your GA ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 12:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC)