Talk:Ethiopian Airlines/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Plarem in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: – Plarem (User | talk | contribs) 21:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC) This article is still under review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The spelling and grammar follow an established system and the meaning of each paragraph is clear and not confusing, follows Wikipedia's Manual of Style.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- There are enough references according to me. Citations are to highly reliable sources: Boeing's website, Royal Norwegian Embassy, NY Times, NYCAviation and the Ethiopian Airlines website news. I can find no original research.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It contains the major aspects of the subject, without going into unecessary detail.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- All seems pretty reasonable to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- I can spot no edit wars on this article.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All the images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales, the pictures are use appropiately and have suitable captions.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- – Plarem (User | talk | contribs) 15:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Passed – I pass this article to GA Standard. – Plarem (User | talk | contribs) 15:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)