Talk:Etosha Pan

1000 million years ago??

Not at all an expert but this seems very unlikely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.212.7.186 (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

2001: A Space Odyssey

There's no mention of this being a film location for the film either on IMDB or the Wikipedia article. A citation would be ideal, or deletion of the suggestion. JohnHarris (talk) 19:19, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Etosha pan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110511081910/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Extremophile?topic=49540 to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Extremophile?topic=49540

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Etosha pan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061001055202/http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/images.php3?img_id=17261 to http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImages/images.php3?img_id=17261

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Neutered Point of View?

I went to the EB link [1] and found a far more lively and therefore interesting article than the one here. It reminded me when, as a kid, I read encyclopaedia articles that were engaging rather than merely informative, and given that many visitors are people who are learning (young) this seems to me a good thing.

"NPOV" in my mind shouldn't be interpreted as a "Neutered Point of View". Of course few of the young academics (I'm assuming that older ones have better things to do with their time, like publishing) who have taken over WikiPedia articles necessarily have the writing skills to add the dimension of interest without stumbling too far, into the gushing style employed by modern advertising. But it would be nice to see once in a while that the author of an article could venture beyond "dry as dust". Admit that it wouldn't be me: I can just imagine the Talk page lighting up.--50.68.140.60 (talk) 17:58, 25 June 2018 (UTC)