Talk:Etymology of Tibet

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Tibet was copied or moved into Definitions of Tibet with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Overuse of Topic

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In the original Tibet wiki page, there is both a section for Name and Definitions of Tibet, which the latter contains only a redirect to its own page. Both these sections are nearly identical. This page should probably be merged into the main Tibet wiki page or possibly the name section into the Definitions of Tibet page. Darthjarek (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Is this a white man narrative website? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.186.10.138 (talk) 08:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Reference correction

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I could be wrong, but I'm combining references [3] and [4] because [4] (Sellheim?, Oriens 34, p. 559) links to [3] (Behr Oriens 34, pp. 557-564). Sellheim was the editor of Oriens 34, but his article "Ṭāq-i Bustān und Kaiser Julian" (pp. 361 - 363) apparently isn't about "Tibet" etymologies. These references derive from the Tibet article footnotes [7] and [8], which I'll correct when I finish revising this main article. Keahapana (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic