Talk:Euday L. Bowman
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Maineartists in topic Confusing section
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Confusing section
editI stumbled across this article after listening to this guy's twelfth street rag on YouTube, and could not make any sense of the section: Claim of Royalties. It has to be the most confusing, poorly worded, out of date mishmash on WP. Until someone can source it correctly, and make sense of whose cousin is whose, and who filed what, etc; I'm going to paste it here for future editing. Maineartists (talk) 19:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Claim of Royalties
- Euday had no children, so the royalties went to his sister. Upon her death one year later, Ed G. Max was appointed temporary administrator for her estate. His siblings, Charlotte Goldman and husband and Harry Loyd Max, filed their opposition to Mary Bowman's will, and alleged that they, with Ed G. Max, their brother, were nephews and niece of Mary M. Bowman and were all and the only heirs to her estate. An intervention was filed by Forrest Campbell and twenty-one others, asserting they were cousins of Mary M. Bowman, and children of deceased cousins of Mary M. Bowman, and were the only heirs of deceased Mary M. Bowman. The cousins ultimately prevailed.
- Euday Bowman's work is not public domain. Royalties remained distributed among hundreds of descendants of the cousins until 2013, when two descendants bought out the others via private auction.[1]
- ^ "GOLDMAN ET AL. v. CAMPBELL ET AL. (05/09/52)". tx.findacase.com.