Talk:Eugene Landy

California Board of Medical Quality Assurance?

I'm not sure what this agency is or was. I looked for it on the web and could not find a clear answer. It can't be the Medical Board of California which regulates medical doctors, which Landy was not. Thus, he would not have had authority to write prescriptions in the first place. Currently clinical psychologists are regulated by the California Board of Psychology. Perhaps this is a defunct agency that had jurisdiction over psychologists at the time.Tom Cod (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Photographs

Is there any photographs of him during the Wilson years that could be used? Dr Feelgood is a very notable person, an open license photo of him with Wilson would be perfect. 115.166.32.231 (talk) 10:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eugene Landy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Shearonink (talk · contribs) 00:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

I am going to Review this article for possible GA status. Shearonink (talk) 00:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Comment. This Review is On Hold until the issue pointed out by the citation needed template - "He frequently employed Gestalt therapy in his treatment technique" - sourced. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   What a sad sad story - well-written article, lays out all the facts. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   Ref #8/(Obituary)independent.co.uk has gone dead.

   There is a "citation needed" template. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

   @Ilovetopaint: The unsourced statement should be removed completely. Ref #2/the obituary from The Independent has gone dead. Shearonink (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

   @Ilovetopaint: The obituary from The Independent has gone stale. It must be removed - surely there is another Landy obituary you could use. Shearonink (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

   Why did you hide the Gestalt therapy statement? It should either be removed completely or sourced & kept. Shearonink (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   Ran the copyvio tool - no problems found. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

   Not a hatchet job/attack page, sticks to the facts about this individual. Shearonink (talk) 21:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

   No edit-warring. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Both images have the proper permissions. Shearonink (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This Review is On Hold until the above issues are corrected/adjusted. Shearonink (talk) 04:56, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

   Congratulations - it's a GA, all the various issues raised in the course of this Review have been adjusted/corrected. Shearonink (talk) 06:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

• I missed the ref suggestion - sorry - and addressed all the issues raised. --Ilovetopaint (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Songwriting credits removal

I understand Landy's name has been removed from the credits on a lot of the Wilson songs he was formerly credited on. Are there any good sources on this? - David Gerard (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)