Talk:Eugenie Scott

California Wild controversy part 2

While I don't agree with WeTe67's deletion of sourced material without discussion I must agree that, lacking any evidence of any formal legal proceedings, this is essentially a non-noteworthy 'storm in a teacup'. Whilst Cadwell's teacup-rattling may be suitable for his own article (given that he never seems to rise above that level), I think Scott's stature is such that we need not bother with it here. Creationist crank 'you were mean to me' lawsuits, & threats thereof, occur all the time -- I see no need to give them WP:UNDUE (i.e. any) weight, lacking a reliable third-party source. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 07:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Nontheism is not atheism

I am reverting the categorization of her as an atheist. She doesn't identify as such. Auntie E. (talk) 03:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Whoops, as has been pointed out to me on my talk page, she does. My mistake. Auntie E. (talk) 06:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

"young earth creationism and intelligent design"?

I'm pretty sure she criticizes creationism in all its forms. She seems to prefer the term "special creation"[1] and recognizes that creationism itself is broader than those two sub-categories. elvenscout742 (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Eugenie Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.the-scientist.com/yr2002/may/watanabe_p60_020527.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Eugenie C. Scott

@Roman Spinner: I have declined your speedy deletion request at Eugenie C. Scott, because I'm not sure it's uncontroversial. Please instead file a move request at WP:RM, to see if this move has the community's consensus. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eugenie Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005105825/http://www.americanhumanist.org:80/Humanism/Humanist_Manifesto_III/Notable_Signers to http://www.americanhumanist.org/Humanism/Humanist_Manifesto_III/Notable_Signers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC)