Talk:Eupatorium

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

The following link: [1] for E. purpureum was on the Joe-Pye Weed page. I'm not sure it is especially worthy of listed as an external link (it is a fairly brief "here's what this plant is like" page, the kind of which there are a fair number of on the web), but I wanted to put it here in case people have a use for it. Kingdon 16:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The John-Pye weeds have been moved out of this genus.

Expert review needed

edit

I have added a fair number of species from all over Wikipedia, but as I have not read the reviews I cannot say which ones are good here. I have checked against GRIN which still includes the John-Pyes (but these are usually readily recognizable). Several species seem very doubtful here; I have left annotations in the source code to assist. I have not annotated the species that were already here and where I could not find any indication that they are not among the core Eupatorium at first glance, but this must not be understood as to mean these are already verified. The entire tribe needs thorough review methinks. Dysmorodrepanis 03:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eupatorium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply