Talk:European Law Students' Association
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 August 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on European Law Students' Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120917141858/http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N98/241/85/PDF/N9824185.pdf?OpenElement to http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N98/241/85/PDF/N9824185.pdf?OpenElement
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Removed 'Verifiable and Neutral' template
editThis article was nominated for deletion, and because of that I took some time to clean this article up. I also included a lot more references, and I tried to use independent third party references as much as possible. For instance, as regards ELSA's status with various international organizations I found independent third party sources for almost all of them and included them in the references. Still, the article refers to the elsa.org website more than I would like but unfortunately this seems in most cases to be the only option. However, whenever statements are made about their number of members and presence in number of countries I have tried to made clear that this is according to their own statements.
In my view, this article has come a long way in terms of neutral point of view and third party verification so I am taking the liberty to remove the 'Verifiable and neutral' banner. If anyone disagrees I am happy to discuss and help improve the article so it finally adheres to Wikipedia's standards. Vunzmstr (talk) 08:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Vunzmstr, sorry, I hadn't seen this message. The article has recently been edited by who appears to be an improperly disclosed paid editor, and the article still relies far too much on primary sources. For this reason, the article now has a {{primary sources}} tag that seems to be justified even after all your welcome and helpful improvements. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:49, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Who on earth would pay to have this article edited? Which edits are you referring to? Vunzmstr (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)