Talk:Evan Strong
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Self-published sources
editThere's still several references to blogspot and tumblr, so I disagree that all of the self-published sources are gone. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- I've scanned through all of the references and found no self-published sources, at this time. At any rate, even if I missed one or two, there certainly aren't enough, out of 64 references to warrant the tag so I'm removing it.
- If due to references being removed, there are unsupported claims made in the article, please either remove them (if you feel that they could be considered defamatory per WP:BLP) or add a {{fact}} tag to the claim so that we can address it specifically. OlYeller21Talktome 19:15, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- On a side note, Jackmcbarn, when you reverted Roger and said that, "blogspot and tumblr (among other things) are self-published sources.", none of those blogspot references (all from a company the sponsors Evan) or tumblr references (don't think it's an official USOC tumblr) are self-published. Even if they were, none of them are being used to establish notability, support controversial information about anyone or anything, or primarly used to support information found in the article. To my count, even if they were self-pubslihed, 7 out of 63 references doesn't constitute a self-citing issue. OlYeller21Talktome 20:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
COI and POV, Self-Sourced
editAs for the COI, I think that Roger has shown an understanding of the COI guideline and a willingness to work with others. At this point, I think we just need to assess whether or not the article has any POV issues brought on by the COI.
I've read through the article. Here is my assessment.
The only possible POV issue that I could find in the article is the mention that he "mastered snowboarding". "Mastered" being the subjective adjective. The reference doesn't say "mastered" but he did become a highly accomplished professional snowboarder. One could easily describe his accomplishments as "mastery" but I can see an argument for WP:OR. I'll change "mastered" to something less WP:POV.
The sections could be better formatted. Specifically, sections about his personal life, including the crash, can be subsections in a section. Similarly, his sports sections could be subsections in a sports section. I think this would help the article seem less like a laundry list of accomplishments, to which Evan obviously has many. I think that might make the article seem boastful but in reality, the guy has just accomplished a lot but that brings me to my next point.
The only other POV/COI issues I can think of is the possibility of omitted information. I've done some searching on my own (not much because I feel like a scumbag doing it) to find any possible negative coverage of Evan. I can't find anything that could have been omitted. As for the self-published sources, we really threw the baby out with the bath water on that one. Self-published sources can absolutely be used as long as the fit the criteria listed at WP:SELFPUB. Because we've given Roger the feeling that all self-published sources are bad, we've lost several sources that supported claims that aren't controversial, like that Evan "enjoys rock climbing, archery and slack lining." There's absolutely no reason that a blog post of Evan's can't be used to support that claim.
If someone has a problem with a self-published source being used, they need to discuss it, specifically, on this talk page. At this point, I think the placement of the template was probably in error (I admit that I haven't gone through every single diff in the history) because of a misunderstanding of WP:SELFPUB.
I'll be removing the last tag and changing the one POV adjective I could find. OlYeller21Talktome 19:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Ski Hill Locations
editMaybe it's just me, being from Alberta, but both Nakiska and Lake Louise are in Alberta, not British Columbia. thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.41.148.220 (talk) 20:27, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Evan Strong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522035102/http://www.adacs.org/ to http://www.adacs.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)