This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Evangelical Times is a newpaper published by Evangelical Press. It is sufficiently notable to warrant an entry of its own, due to its relatively long existence, worldwide circulation, and distinctive theological basis, but until someone is able to do this, I have updated this article to mention it. Sidefall16:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This article has a number of spam links to commercial websites where you can buy books from this publisher and other unnecessary links to the publisher itself. I would remove them all but another user reverts each time.Teapotgeorge (talk) 16:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've just come here for the first time, and seen the revert war. Here's my thoughts. Now this article is very short. There is no reason why a site about a publisher should not link to the publisher's website. If the products are not mainstream, there is no reason why readers should not be able to find a link to where they can obtain them. That's not spam, I think. I'm sympathetic to the issues; we need a less PR tone, eventually. But... teapotgeorge, I'm not sure that you're contributing here. Woolly is adding stuff. Are you? If not, let him write the article in peace, hmm? (I hope I haven't misunderstood who is doing what; I'm just looking at the article). User:Roger Pearse|Roger Pearse]] (talk) Roger Pearse 12:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Various changes in the way EP operates too place at the beginning of 2015 which were reported in the February issue of Evangelical Times. I have made some of the changes and cited the article. I will check with the EP MD that the article is now accurate and make further amendments as necessary.DigbyJames (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
