This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Article created. I have written on background and the High Court judgment. I'm aware that it is important to get a similar level of detail on the CoA judgment, especially seeing that it overturned the decision and I wouldn't want for the article to be biased. I'm working on it, but it's a lengthy judgment and I'd appreciate any assistance. Best, Shayday~enwiki (talk) 17:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Just had a look and can't find a transcript. I'm sure there would be something on Westlaw or Lexis, but not that we could use on here. Just saw that you cleaned up my refs: thanks I appreciate it! Shayday~enwiki (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
No probs. A pity about the case - given the growing propensity to take political issues to the courts, it would aid public interest to have all transcripts in such cases easily accessible. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
