Talk:Evansville Central High School

No Child Left Behind Section

The section labeled academics doesn't have any citation, nor does it really qualify as the "Academics" headline. While it is interesting information, I don't know if it fits in this article. I would like to hear discussion for or against. --Twintone 03:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

The citation comes directly from the Indiana Department of Education's AYP. There is now a link along with the article. As for the area labeled academics, the NCLB policy clearly states that the AYP is what schools either improve or fail. If you have a better choice than the label "Academics," without having a bias view upon the NCLB, it should be created. However, without stating a stance on the NCLB policy, I believe academics is the correct category. MoziFox 21:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Athletics Sections

It might be beneficial to have a short section about the highschool's history and involvement with atheletics.--Twintone 15:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Centralbear.gif

Image:Centralbear.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Indiana assessment

This page needs inline citations. Providing in line citations to this article will advance this article to a B Class article. -Jahnx (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

General Comments

I feel that this is a very poorly written page. It is very biased at times and does not inform well. Actually relevant information is scattered throughout irrelevant "filler," as I would call it. The overly detailed first graduating class could be done without, and other similar portions. Also, the Sports section is very lacking. I feel that a school with nearly 1800 students could put together a really stellar Wikipedia page. I do not attend the school. Someone who does should make this page a project of the school newspaper. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wade.bieber (talk • contribs) 03:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evansville Central High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060311074743/http://www.evsc.k12.in.us/ to http://www.evsc.k12.in.us/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)