Talk:Evelyn Fox Keller

Verification

I believe this article now has sufficient citations to remove the citation tag. WVhybrid (talk) 18:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

I haven't seen any comments regarding the additional citations. I will remove the citation tag today. I am considering adding a tag asking for the lead section to be rewritten. WVhybrid (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Evelyn Fox Keller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.mit.edu/sts/people/keller.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dartmouth.edu/~news/releases/2008/04/22e.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/misc/webfeat/gonzoscientist/episode14/index.xhtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050907194010/http://womenwriters.net/archives/whittoned1.htm to http://www.womenwriters.net/archives/whittoned1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evelyn Fox Keller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130123054650/http://www.ffipp.org/about_us to http://ffipp.org/about_us

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Place of death

If anyone wants to go to the trouble of adding a reference for the place of the death (the family had previously told me privately), the NYTimes obit confirms it https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/30/science/evelyn-fox-keller-dead.html (retrieved 2023-10-07). Paradoox (talk) 01:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

 Done added to Biography section + NYT citation Netherzone (talk) 01:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Confusing sentences

The following makes no sense to me. It lacks context. "She had been feeling disenchantment from her colleague publishing her team's work and she had not realized the reason behind it until she did her research." Zaslav (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

Also, "By addressing Boyle's quote in this aspect, Keller suggests that as soon as questionable aspects are displayed in nature, "nature" becomes "nature" and is then feminine."

Another sentence that needs to be clearer: "These debates raise the broader question of the distinction between the analysis of women in science as a profession vs. gender and scientific theory." Why "vs."? What is the question alluded to?