Talk:Events preceding World War II in Asia

Military history: Asian / Japanese / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	World War II task force

China: History Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as Low-importance).

Kuomintang and Communism in China

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this section be deleted. It's information is very specific, not directly related to the article's subject and covered more appropriately in the time line. --Mckinlayr 06:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Srry, but...

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't see whats wrong with the article but I didn't even read it. So what do I know? (but I guess I will agree with you if it makes you happy!) Ciscokid21 12:25 (Pacific), October 1st 2008

(blond moment) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciscokid21 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, now...

I understand what you mean now that I read the article and I tootally agree with you now

Ciscokid21 12:34 (Pacific), October 1st 2008

(not a blond moment)

Add topic