Talk:EverQuest Next
Italics
editSo why is the title not written in italics? Is it because it's a working title? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 16:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it's not an actual title; it's just what the project is referred to for lack of a real name. Powers T 20:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Title confirmed as official via Georgeson twitter. This whole article needs a lot of work... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.5.26.19 (talk) 06:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Everquest Next?
editHey this game is the F2P version of Everquest — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.130.18.69 (talk) 18:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- No, it's not. Powers T 20:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
It Actually is going to be Free To Play. Straight from SoE president John Smedley (2:57) in the video. You can wait for some "reputable" print organization to start writing about it but it's free to play.
Youtube link with interview.
Platform
editOnly confirmed for PC at this time. PS4 is pure speculation, should be removed until it has been officially confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.94.138 (talk) 15:04, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Subscription Model
editI am unclear on a quote here. It was: "During SOE Live John Smedley also mentioned that EverQuest Next will attempt to keep the P2P subscription model for as long as possible.". Someone changed it to P2P after I put a clarification needed tag there, and expanded F2P to Free to Play. I don't think that is accurate. P2P may have been an acronym for "Pay to Play" (i.e. the traditional subscription model). Free to play isn't a subscription model. Does anyone have a better reference for this? Otherwise I'm going to remove that line completely (since I believe it to be wrong as it is now, and unclear when it was P2P). Caidh (talk) 15:29, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, it makes no sense as it is now. Smedley could not have meant F2P. --SubSeven (talk) 20:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
It Actually is going to be Free To Play. Straight from SoE president John Smedley (2:57) in the video. You can wait for some "reputable" print organization to start writing about it but it's free to play.
Youtube link with interview.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_1BPM1DgSY
Jado818 (talk) 01:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jado818 (talk • contribs)
- OK, so it was just worded incorrectly in the article then (it's F2P, not a subscription) --SubSeven (talk) 02:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Cartoonish Look
edit"While previous titles by the developer have been "cartoonish" this engine re-defines them. It has lost its cartoon sense almost completely, heading for realism."
This new game is much more cartoonish than EQ1/2.
Daysy (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Guess it doesn't matter now. The game was cancelled. :( Jakeroberts93 (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)