Talk:Everett Scott

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Everett Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120317234131/http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/sports/top50/scott.php to http://fwnextweb1.fortwayne.com/ns/sports/top50/scott.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131102062010/http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/ballplayers/S/Scott_Everett.stm to http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/ballplayers/S/Scott_Everett.stm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Everett Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160129221033/http://egen.fortwayne.com/ns/projects/komets/top50/ to http://egen.fortwayne.com/ns/projects/komets/top50/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160130002039/http://egen.fortwayne.com/ns/projects/komets/top50/scott.php to http://egen.fortwayne.com/ns/projects/komets/top50/scott.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Everett Scott/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bloom6132 (talk · contribs) 08:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm going to be reviewing over the next couple of hours. —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Syntax and word choice meet the standard set out by the criteria.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Broad and comprehensive array of reliable sources used. No original research identified. No copyvio or plagiarism spotted – Earwig's detector says "violation unlikely" and any use of same/similar terms can be attributed to WP:LIMITED.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Focused and does not delve into trivia. However, the only minor concern I have is the "Early life" section looks a bit thin. Any possibility of expanding it a little?

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Factual and balanced coverage given, leaving little (if any) possibility for bias.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   None – only 2 editors (including nominator) have edited the article since it was nominated for GAN.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Both images are free and in public domain. Captions are succinct.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Additional comments–

• The last two sources (refs #45 and #46) should include the article titles. However, since these are minor copyedit-like changes, I've taken the liberty to correct them myself.
• I understand that there probably aren't many sources covering Scott's early life. It's a minor concern now at GA level, but will likely have to be addressed if you wish to take this further. I'll try hunting for some myself, and if I can't find anything decent, I'll give this the green light and pass it. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:57, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

• I've combed through Google Books and HighBeam over the past day. I found several trivial tidbits like his knack for bridge and how his nickname was derived from his quiet demeanour. However, I still couldn't find any info regarding his early life. Given that this is the case, and that this was my only (minor) beef with an otherwise concise and decent article, I'll be passing this. —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

• @Bloom6132: Thanks! I'll take a look at those links and add anything else I can. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)