| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Everything article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on April 7, 2024. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep. |
 | A fact from Everything appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Sources
editThese sources are pretty poor - we need more than an author's name.-Wafulz (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- I revisited the main article and added more details to them. Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- Okay thanks.-Wafulz (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Opening Sentence should be revised
edit"Everything could be you or me, it may be the world, the universe, the solar system, all physical objects and sometimes also all abstract objects. It is contrasted with nothing."
not exactly the most scholarly tone, is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.171.137 (talk) 21:45, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
- I was just thinking the same thing. Also, "Everything could be you or me..." implies that you could be everything. When of course, you aren't everything (though I am, of course). I have changed it to something a bit more accurate (and encyclopedic), hope it satisfies. -kotra (talk) 23:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
eveuthing/ rainbow bubbles. by owen michael john gilvarry
editthe smallest unit of atomics is a rainbow bubble. it encompasses all elements and colours. insane theory is linke to the everything story along with potential theory. we beleive insane theory absolves everyone from blame because we have all been every infinite possibility,potential. evil is insane. we all have moments of insanity and we all have moments of love. if we realise self responsibility and that all our ancestors are related and have been so from the begining we will realise we have been hitler,stalin, princess di,mother teresa. venus. we have all been equally good and bad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.229.154 (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your thoughts, but this talk page is just for discussion about improving the article Everything. Also, how did you know I'm Stalin? -kotra (talk) 19:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Links to all Wiki Pages and Templates
edit- Shouldn't all pages and templates be linked to this page? Humor, of course, but, then again. . . Randy Kryn (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Nowai
editYou mean liek the whole thing?! Everything?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.24.135 (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Anchoring the silliness
edit"Everything" isn't really a philosophical concept of any worth. There are Sartre's Totalisations and the like but the actual concept that receives some traction in the tradition is Nothingness, so put that in the lede. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
AfD
editI'm tempted to nominate this article for deletion on the basis of the implicit claim that everything is notable. Jack N. Stock (talk) 03:34, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.83.102.139 (talk) 01:37, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is the first time I've had a good laugh in a long time. Usersnipedname (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
translating
editDoes anyone know how to add translation? Ivan4ik3859 (talk) 19:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)