Talk:Ewan Crawford

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Drmies in topic BLP violations

BLP violations

edit

We have a hobbyist here, someone interested in Tasmanian stamps and this judge, who keeps inserting what I consider to be a BLP violation--a rambling paragraph (without secondary sources) about murder meant, I think, to cast doubt on this judge. Hard to tell--it's not well-written. I have removed those from the history and will apply long-term semi-protection to this article to prevent this disruption. See these contributions, and these, and a recent set of two, this and this. Drmies (talk) 17:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for drawing my attention to it. It is on my watchlist. I am not an admin however, and so can only guess at the content. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Haha, that's exactly the point, Philafrenzy. :) It concerns a murder, which the IP claimed is somehow a notable case in the judge's career, but the IP didn't manage to insert the content properly, either grammatically or in terms of secondary sources, or in agreement with the BLP. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Drmies. Will watch out for any more violations but it should be okay now with the protections. Jack | talk page 19:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to both of you. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply