Talk:Exalcomm
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Amyekut in topic Confusion in section "Relation with the cotangent complex"
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Todo
edit- define morphisms between them
- give examples of morphisms and non-isomorphic extensions
- show module structure for exal
- define exal for schemes
- add explanation of composition of exal groups with the module formed by a direct sum of dual numbers, giving
Confusion in section "Relation with the cotangent complex"
editI think there is a mistake here. The correct statement should be
.
Illusie, in [1], uses instead of Grothendieck's .
None of the original French texts use , they write (EGA IV) or (Illusie).