Talk:Exchange value

Untitled

Is this a wikipedia article or a student paper? I've read most of the first half hoping to find out what an exchange value actually *is*, and all I'm learning is what it *isn't*. Plus irrelevant asides about shiny cars that taste of lemons or somesuch bollocks.

Perhaps someone who knows what they're talking about might like to try their hands at a rewrite. It would be greatly appreciated

82.68.20.86 (talk) 13:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

suggestion

The article could do with more discussion of Adam Smith.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

The last section of this article, specifically the section about criticism against Marxist theory, reads like a college essay rather than an encyclopedia, and could be a legitimate target for NPOV concerns 130.49.61.248 (talk) 10:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

original research and almost no sources?

Ton of literature out there to draw on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 07:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exchange value. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216230210/http://www.heartfield.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/economy.pdf to http://www.heartfield.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/economy.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

the lead is incoherent.

it tries to describe different aspects of value and it completely fails. 98.7.201.234 (talk) 06:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)