Talk:Exclusive dealing

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The reference to 'Restrictive Trade Practices Act' is not in a recognised form. Needs formal legal citation, including jurisdiction.

Indeed. Which country does that refer to? Remember that Wikipedia is directed at a worldwide audience and as such the jurisdiction of any laws mentioned should be made clear. Rafy 08:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Grammar

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Several grammar errors in the opening section. Drscar18 (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Odd and Arbitrary Ordering of Sections, Excessive Detail

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The sections of the page have no coherent order to them. An example is "Third Line Forcing". The description of Australian law doesn't include anything about it, but the one for EU law does. But then the section "Case Illustrating Third Line Forcing" right below it is a case from an Australian court.

There are also several cases that go into excessive depth. Baneonplane (talk) 22:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic