Talk:Executive Order 13767
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Executive Order 13767. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Executive Order 13767 at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
| This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cbhughes. Peer reviewers: Irenekeller.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vitas m.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Environmental impact
editI think there should be more talk on environmental impacts. There are crazy environmental justice issues at hand here potentially--the walls crossing over native lands, toxic waste affecting neary communities, and just the overall demographic disparities between communities near the border and those further away.
Cbhughes (talk) 17:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Potential Bibliography materials:
Book: Environmental Inequalities Beyond Borders: Local Perspectives on Global Injustices
EPA Report: BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE REPORT
Press Release: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/25/executive-order-border-security-and-immigration-enforcement-improvements
Cbhughes (talk) 07:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC).
I totally agree with you, the topic of the environmental impact should be increase. Thousands are worrying about a wall that can make them give up their home. This is land for some that has been theirs for 10 plus years, where their memories are deep within the foundation. Check “Border homes, and the wall that would tear them apart.” www.usatoday.com/border-wall/story/eminent-domain-trump-border-wall-rio-grande/638916001/. One family mentions “I was born here, my dad was born here, my ancestors were born here”, this is a very sensitive issue related with the environmental impact--Alessandro Pappalardo (talk) 15:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Potential outline
edit-this article does really getting the main ideas across about what this executive order calls for and would be helpful to someone getting started on an outline of the implications of this new order -instead of “for prosecution guidelines, for prosecution of illegal immigrants” , maybe take out the “for” because it is unnecessary -the first line of the funding section doesn't really have to do with funding but more with the general facts about building the wall, so maybe put it in another section -in the “expert’s response” section maybe clarify who these experts and critics are or at least what they specialize in (this will definitely be something i will fix about my own article) -overall there seems to be a negative connotation in the article to building this wall so maybe incorporate why people who advocated for the wall wanted it so that both sides of the story are being told -i really liked how concise and to the point this article is and will try to apply that to my article Alexis1621 (talk)
Alternate names
editI was thinking we should link something like Trump's wall here for people who can't memorize the number of this order. Thoughts? News article use phrases like that (simply than Trump's border wall) to refer to this. ScratchMarshall (talk) 05:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
I think that Trump wall or something like it should probably be an independent article, given that the concept goes way beyond this executive order, from the campaign to currently. Pharos (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Impact on Mexico-U.S. relations
editI think it is important to mention the reason why Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto decided to cancel the appointment with President Trump. Cancelling an appointment like this to talk about the future of the two nations, or rather of the wall and therefore of the division between Mexico and the United States, is a strong symbol of disapproval and of opposition to Trump's will and therefore we should cite the motivations of this gesture to better understand the "Impact on Mexico-US relations." --Alessandro Pappalardo (talk) 00:08, 11 December 2017 (UTC)